19/05/2021 19:47, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/19/2021 6:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The Doxygen comments are placed before the related lines,
> > but the markers were /**< instead of /**
> >
> > The struct rte_flow_item_integrity did not appear in Doxygen output
> > because there was no general com
On 5/19/2021 6:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/05/2021 19:47, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 5/19/2021 6:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> The Doxygen comments are placed before the related lines,
>>> but the markers were /**< instead of /**
>>>
>>> The struct rte_flow_item_integrity did not appear in Doxy
19/05/2021 19:47, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/19/2021 6:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The Doxygen comments are placed before the related lines,
> > but the markers were /**< instead of /**
> >
> > The struct rte_flow_item_integrity did not appear in Doxygen output
> > because there was no general com
On 5/19/2021 6:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The Doxygen comments are placed before the related lines,
> but the markers were /**< instead of /**
>
> The struct rte_flow_item_integrity did not appear in Doxygen output
> because there was no general comment for the struct.
>
> Fixes: b10a421a1f3
The Doxygen comments are placed before the related lines,
but the markers were /**< instead of /**
The struct rte_flow_item_integrity did not appear in Doxygen output
because there was no general comment for the struct.
Fixes: b10a421a1f3b ("ethdev: add packet integrity check flow rules")
Signed
5 matches
Mail list logo
