Thanks, Thomas and Ferruh
I think I can implement v3 for this.
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2018 6:37 PM
> To: Yigit, Ferruh ; Dai, Wei
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] e
13/04/2018 19:31, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 3/28/2018 9:57 AM, Wei Dai wrote:
> > This patch check if a requested offloading
> > is supported in the device capability.
> > A per port offloading feature should be enabled or
> > disabled at same time in both rte_eth_dev_configure( )
> > and rte_eth_rx_queue
On 3/28/2018 9:57 AM, Wei Dai wrote:
> This patch check if a requested offloading
> is supported in the device capability.
> A per port offloading feature should be enabled or
> disabled at same time in both rte_eth_dev_configure( )
> and rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( )/rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( ).
> This
This patch check if a requested offloading
is supported in the device capability.
A per port offloading feature should be enabled or
disabled at same time in both rte_eth_dev_configure( )
and rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( )/rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( ).
This patch check if a per port offloading flag has
sam
4 matches
Mail list logo