Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2018-12-21 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/5/2016 6:47 PM, jt at labs.hpe.com (Jean Tourrilhes) wrote: > If the primary and secondary process were build using different build > systems, the list of constructors included by the linker in each > binary might be different. Tailqs are registered via constructors, so > the linker magic wil

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: don't fail secondary if primary is missing tailqs

2016-10-05 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
If the primary and secondary process were build using different build systems, the list of constructors included by the linker in each binary might be different. Tailqs are registered via constructors, so the linker magic will directly impact which tailqs are registered with the primary and the sec