Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: build and use libabigail 1.6

2020-02-19 Thread Dodji Seketeli
Hello, David Marchand writes: >> > + >> > LIBABIGAIL_REPO=${LIBABIGAIL_REPO:-https://sourceware.org/git/libabigail.git} >> > +LIBABIGAIL_VERSION=${LIBABIGAIL_VERSION:-libabigail-1.6} >> > + >> > +if [ "$(cat libabigail/VERSION 2>/dev/null)" != "$LIBABIGAIL_VERSION" >> > ]; then >> >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: build and use libabigail 1.6

2020-02-18 Thread David Marchand
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:46 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 18/02/2020 15:29, David Marchand: > > libabigail 1.2 (at least) reports changes in 'const' property as an ABI > > breakage [1]. > > This was fixed upstream in libabigail 1.4 [2], and a bug has been opened > > in launchpad [3]. > > > > But

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: build and use libabigail 1.6

2020-02-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/02/2020 15:29, David Marchand: > libabigail 1.2 (at least) reports changes in 'const' property as an ABI > breakage [1]. > This was fixed upstream in libabigail 1.4 [2], and a bug has been opened > in launchpad [3]. > > But for now, build and use the last version 1.6 so that the ABI checks > ca

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: build and use libabigail 1.6

2020-02-18 Thread David Marchand
libabigail 1.2 (at least) reports changes in 'const' property as an ABI breakage [1]. This was fixed upstream in libabigail 1.4 [2], and a bug has been opened in launchpad [3]. But for now, build and use the last version 1.6 so that the ABI checks can be kept. 1: https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/j