Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bus/pci: fix Windows kernel driver categories

2021-03-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/03/2021 23:07, Ranjit Menon: > On 3/18/2021 3:48 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > In Windows probing, the value RTE_PCI_KDRV_NONE was used > > instead of RTE_PCI_KDRV_UNKNOWN. > > This value covers the mlx case where the kernel driver is in place, > > offering a bifurcated mode to the userspace dr

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bus/pci: fix Windows kernel driver categories

2021-03-18 Thread Ranjit Menon
On 3/18/2021 3:48 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: In Windows probing, the value RTE_PCI_KDRV_NONE was used instead of RTE_PCI_KDRV_UNKNOWN. This value covers the mlx case where the kernel driver is in place, offering a bifurcated mode to the userspace driver. When the kernel driver is listed as unknow

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bus/pci: fix Windows kernel driver categories

2021-03-18 Thread Tal Shnaiderman
> Subject: [PATCH v2] bus/pci: fix Windows kernel driver categories > > In Windows probing, the value RTE_PCI_KDRV_NONE was used instead of > RTE_PCI_KDRV_UNKNOWN. > This value covers the mlx case where the kernel driver is in place, offering a > bifurcated mode to the userspace driver. > When the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bus/pci: fix Windows kernel driver categories

2021-03-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
In Windows probing, the value RTE_PCI_KDRV_NONE was used instead of RTE_PCI_KDRV_UNKNOWN. This value covers the mlx case where the kernel driver is in place, offering a bifurcated mode to the userspace driver. When the kernel driver is listed as unknown, there is no special treatment in DPDK probin