2015-03-04 10:42, Neil Horman:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:15:18PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-03-04 09:39, Neil Horman:
> > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:54:49PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Hi Neil,
> > > >
> > > > I remove parts that I agree and reply to those which deserve
2015-03-04 09:39, Neil Horman:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:54:49PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > I remove parts that I agree and reply to those which deserve more
> > discussion.
> >
> > 2015-03-04 06:49, Neil Horman:
> > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:18:47PM +0100, Thomas M
Hi Neil,
I remove parts that I agree and reply to those which deserve more discussion.
2015-03-04 06:49, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:18:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-02-02 13:18, Neil Horman:
> > > +# Validate that we have all the arguments we need
> > > +res=$(validat
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:15:18PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-03-04 09:39, Neil Horman:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:54:49PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi Neil,
> > >
> > > I remove parts that I agree and reply to those which deserve more
> > > discussion.
> > >
> > > 2015-0
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:54:49PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> I remove parts that I agree and reply to those which deserve more discussion.
>
> 2015-03-04 06:49, Neil Horman:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:18:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2015-02-02 13:18, Neil Horman
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:18:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-02-02 13:18, Neil Horman:
> > There was a request for an abi validation utiltyfor the ongoing ABI
> > stability
> > work. As it turns out there is a abi compliance checker in development that
> > seems to be under active deve
2015-02-02 13:18, Neil Horman:
> There was a request for an abi validation utiltyfor the ongoing ABI stability
> work. As it turns out there is a abi compliance checker in development that
> seems to be under active development and provides fairly detailed ABI
> compliance
> reports. Its not yet
Hi Neil,
2015-02-27 08:48, Neil Horman:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:18:26PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > There was a request for an abi validation utiltyfor the ongoing ABI
> > stability
> > work. As it turns out there is a abi compliance checker in development that
> > seems to be under activ
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:18:26PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> There was a request for an abi validation utiltyfor the ongoing ABI stability
> work. As it turns out there is a abi compliance checker in development that
> seems to be under active development and provides fairly detailed ABI
> comp
There was a request for an abi validation utiltyfor the ongoing ABI stability
work. As it turns out there is a abi compliance checker in development that
seems to be under active development and provides fairly detailed ABI compliance
reports. Its not yet intellegent enough to understand symbol v
10 matches
Mail list logo
