> > For Periodic timers ,if the lag gets introduced, the current code
> > added additional delay when the next peridoc timer was initialized
> > by not taking into account the delay added, with this fix the code
> > would start the next occurrence of timer keeping in account the
> > lag added.Corre
Hi Suyash,
> -Original Message-
> From: Karmarkar Suyash [mailto:skarmarkar at sonusnet.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 11:36 PM
> To: Sanford, Robert ; dev at dpdk.org;
> thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; Pattan, Reshma
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2]:rte_timer:timer lag issue correction
>
Thanks !! So as next steps I will push the patch .
-Original Message-
From: Sanford, Robert [mailto:rsanf...@akamai.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:40 PM
To: Karmarkar Suyash ; dev at dpdk.org;
thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; reshma.pattan at intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]:rte_tim
Yes, this change makes sense. I ran timer tests and they passed.
Acked-by: Robert Sanford
Thanks,
Robert
On 9/29/16, 10:27 AM, "Karmarkar Suyash" wrote:
Hello,
Can you please review the changes and suggest next steps? Thanks
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
From: Karma
Sorry, just saw this. I will take a look and get back shortly.
--
Regards,
Robert
On 10/4/16, 3:31 PM, "Karmarkar Suyash" wrote:
Hello Robert/Thomas,
Can you please review the changes in V2 of the Patch and suggest next steps?
Thanks
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
Fro
Hello Robert/Thomas,
Can you please review the changes in V2 of the Patch and suggest next steps?
Thanks
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 10:27 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; rsanford at akamai.
Hello,
Can you please review the changes and suggest next steps? Thanks
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:54 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; rsanford at akamai.com;
reshma.pattan at intel.com
C
Hi,
2016-09-21 17:08, Karmarkar Suyash:
> Hello,
>
> I corrected the fixes line, Can you please review the change and if no
> further comments can you please let me know the next steps. Thanks.
The Fixes lines is still not correct. The id ba885531ac26 do not exist.
Please check your patch with
Hello,
I corrected the fixes line, Can you please review the change and if no further
comments can you please let me know the next steps. Thanks.
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-Original Message-
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 12:02 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: thomas.
For Periodic timers ,if the lag gets introduced, the current code
added additional delay when the next peridoc timer was initialized
by not taking into account the delay added, with this fix the code
would start the next occurrence of timer keeping in account the
lag added.Corrected the behavio
For Periodic timers ,if the lag gets introduced, the current code
added additional delay when the next peridoc timer was initialized
by not taking into account the delay added, with this fix the code
would start the next occurrence of timer keeping in account the
lag added.Corrected the behavio
For Periodic timers ,if the lag gets introduced, the current code
added additional delay when the next peridoc timer was initialized
by not taking into account the delay added, with this fix the code
would start the next occurrence of timer keeping in account the
lag added.Corrected the behavio
12 matches
Mail list logo
