Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 0/8] add Tx preparation

2017-01-06 Thread Avi Kivity
On 01/04/2017 09:41 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 2016-12-23 19:40, Tomasz Kulasek: v15 changes: - marked rte_eth_tx_prepare api as experimental - improved doxygen comments for nb_seg_max and nb_mtu_seg_max fields - removed unused "uint8_t tx_prepare" declaration from testpmd No you didn't r

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 0/8] add Tx preparation

2017-01-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-23 19:40, Tomasz Kulasek: > v15 changes: > - marked rte_eth_tx_prepare api as experimental > - improved doxygen comments for nb_seg_max and nb_mtu_seg_max fields > - removed unused "uint8_t tx_prepare" declaration from testpmd No you didn't remove this useless declaration. I did it for

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 0/8] add Tx preparation

2016-12-23 Thread Tomasz Kulasek
As discussed in that thread: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023603.html Different NIC models depending on HW offload requested might impose different requirements on packets to be TX-ed in terms of: - Max number of fragments per packet allowed - Max number of fragments per TSO