On 13-Dec-18 12:13 PM, Hunt, David wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
On 10/12/2018 12:30 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 22-Nov-18 5:02 PM, David Hunt wrote:
since we're moving to allowing greater than 64 cores, the mask functions
that use uint64_t to perform functions on a masked set of cores are no
longer f
Hi Anatoly,
On 10/12/2018 12:30 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 22-Nov-18 5:02 PM, David Hunt wrote:
since we're moving to allowing greater than 64 cores, the mask functions
that use uint64_t to perform functions on a masked set of cores are no
longer feasable, so removing them.
Perhaps "neede
On 22-Nov-18 5:02 PM, David Hunt wrote:
since we're moving to allowing greater than 64 cores, the mask functions
that use uint64_t to perform functions on a masked set of cores are no
longer feasable, so removing them.
Perhaps "needed" is a better word, rather than "feasible" :)
Please correct
since we're moving to allowing greater than 64 cores, the mask functions
that use uint64_t to perform functions on a masked set of cores are no
longer feasable, so removing them.
Signed-off-by: David Hunt
---
examples/vm_power_manager/channel_monitor.c | 24
examples/vm_power_manager/power
4 matches
Mail list logo
