> >
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:16 PM Feifei Wang
> > wrote:
> > > > Are we missing a check in the UT so that dequeued object is what
> > > > had been enqueued?
Yes, missing for single element enqueue/dequeue
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Dequeue is not necessary to change because the param defined i
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:16 PM Feifei Wang wrote:
> > Are we missing a check in the UT so that dequeued object is what had been
> > enqueued?
> >
> >
> Dequeue is not necessary to change because the param defined in
> rte_ring_dequeue
> is different from that in rte_ring_enqueue:
> rte_ring_enqu
Hello Feifei,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:32 AM Feifei Wang wrote:
>
> When enqueue one element (object of type void*) to ring in the
> performance test, a pointer (the object to be enqueued) should be
> passed to rte_ring_[sp|mp]enqueue APIs, not the pointer to a table
> of void *pointers (objects
When enqueue one element (object of type void*) to ring in the
performance test, a pointer (the object to be enqueued) should be
passed to rte_ring_[sp|mp]enqueue APIs, not the pointer to a table
of void *pointers (objects).
Fixes: a9fe152363e2 ("test/ring: add custom element size functional tests
4 matches
Mail list logo
