For non-EAL thread, bypass per lcore cache, directly use ring pool.
It allows using rte_mempool in either EAL thread or any user pthread.
As in non-EAL thread, it directly rely on rte_ring and it's none preemptive.
It doesn't suggest to run multi-pthread/cpu which compete the rte_mempool.
It will g
Hi Miroslaw,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Walukiewicz, Miroslaw
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:45 PM
> To: Liang, Cunming; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 13/15] mempool: add support to no
> -Original Message-
> From: Liang, Cunming
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 1:20 PM
> To: Walukiewicz, Miroslaw; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 13/15] mempool: add support to non-EAL
> thread
>
>
>
> > -Original Message
> -Original Message-
> From: Walukiewicz, Miroslaw
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:53 PM
> To: Liang, Cunming; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 13/15] mempool: add support to non-EAL
> thread
>
>
>
> > -Original Messa
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Cunming Liang
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 9:17 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 13/15] mempool: add support to non-EAL
> thread
>
> For non-EAL thread
5 matches
Mail list logo
