Hi Flavio,
Thanks for your comments.
snipped
> > The patch fixes the error scenario by skipping to next descriptor.
> > Note: Drop counters are not currently supported.
In that case shouldn't we continue to process the ring?
Yes, we are updating the loop index and following the requir
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:43:01AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Sivaprasad,
>
> On 4/28/20 11:52 AM, Sivaprasad Tummala wrote:
> > vhost buffer allocation is successful for packets that fit
> > into a linear buffer. If it fails, vhost library is expected
> > to drop the current buffer descri
Hi Sivaprasad,
On 4/28/20 11:52 AM, Sivaprasad Tummala wrote:
> vhost buffer allocation is successful for packets that fit
> into a linear buffer. If it fails, vhost library is expected
> to drop the current buffer descriptor and skip to the next.
>
> The patch fixes the error scenario by skippin
vhost buffer allocation is successful for packets that fit
into a linear buffer. If it fails, vhost library is expected
to drop the current buffer descriptor and skip to the next.
The patch fixes the error scenario by skipping to next descriptor.
Note: Drop counters are not currently supported.
S
4 matches
Mail list logo
