On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:06:05PM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> > get_hugepage_dir() was implemented in such a way that a --huge-dir option
> > had to exactly match the mountpoint, but there's no reason for this
> > restriction. Fix the implementation to allow a sub-directory within a
> > suitab
2021-06-25 11:44 (UTC+0100), John Levon:
> get_hugepage_dir() was implemented in such a way that a --huge-dir option
> had to exactly match the mountpoint, but there's no reason for this
> restriction. Fix the implementation to allow a sub-directory within a
> suitable hugetlbfs mountpoint to be sp
Hello Anatoly,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:46 PM John Levon wrote:
>
> get_hugepage_dir() was implemented in such a way that a --huge-dir option
> had to exactly match the mountpoint, but there's no reason for this
> restriction. Fix the implementation to allow a sub-directory within a
> suitable
get_hugepage_dir() was implemented in such a way that a --huge-dir option
had to exactly match the mountpoint, but there's no reason for this
restriction. Fix the implementation to allow a sub-directory within a
suitable hugetlbfs mountpoint to be specified.
Signed-off-by: John Levon
---
lib/eal
4 matches
Mail list logo
