Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2019 21:04
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Kevin Traynor ; Xu, Rosen
> ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH 4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check logic
>
> Coverity is complaining about
November 05, 2019 23:42
>> To: David Marchand ; Xu, Rosen
>>
>> Cc: dev ; dpdk stable ; Ye, Xiaolong
>>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check
>> logic
>>
>> On 30/10/2019 07:59, David Marchand wrote:
>>> He
Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check
> logic
>
> On 30/10/2019 07:59, David Marchand wrote:
> > Hello Rosen,
> >
> > Review please.
> >
>
> Ping Rosen.
>
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor
> wrote:
ong
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check
> logic
>
> Hello Rosen,
>
> Review please.
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor wrote:
> >
> > Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which
> &
On 30/10/2019 07:59, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Rosen,
>
> Review please.
>
Ping Rosen.
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor wrote:
>>
>> Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which branch
>> of the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will always
Hello Rosen,
Review please.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Kevin Traynor wrote:
>
> Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which branch
> of the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will always be
> returned if this if else is hit. Remove the else branch.
>
>
Coverity is complaining about identical code regardless of which branch
of the if else is taken. Functionally it means an error will always be
returned if this if else is hit. Remove the else branch.
CID 337928 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
(IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_
7 matches
Mail list logo
