On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:04:30PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 08/23/2016 10:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> >The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
> >desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly.
> >
> >Doing so, however, has one major
On 08/23/2016 04:31 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:04:30PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/23/2016 10:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
>>> desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr
The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly.
Doing so, however, has one major issue: we can't update the used ring
at the end of rte_vhost_dequeue_burst. Because we don't do the copy
here, an update of the
On 08/23/2016 10:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
> desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly.
>
> Doing so, however, has one major issue: we can't update the used ring
> at the end of rte_vhost_dequeue_burst
4 matches
Mail list logo