Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] ethdev: separate driver APIs

2017-12-01 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/1/2017 12:59 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > On 12/1/2017 7:59 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > ... >> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_driver.h >> b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_driver.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0..3e77d1439 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethd

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] ethdev: separate driver APIs

2017-12-01 Thread Hemant Agrawal
On 12/1/2017 7:59 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: ... diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_driver.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_driver.h new file mode 100644 index 0..3e77d1439 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_driver.h @@ -0,0 +1,163 @@ +/*- + * BSD LICENSE + * + * Copy

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] ethdev: separate driver APIs

2017-12-01 Thread Ferruh Yigit
Create a rte_ethdev_driver.h file and move PMD specific APIs here. Drivers updated to include this new header file. There is no update in header content and since ethdev.h included by ethdev_driver.h, nothing changed from driver point of view, only logically grouping of APIs. From applications poi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] ethdev: separate driver APIs

2017-11-30 Thread Shreyansh Jain
Hello Ferruh, (Somehow it seems that patch was not delivered to dev@dpdk ML). One comment below: [] > > There is no update in header content and since ethdev.h included by > ethdev_driver.h, nothing changed from driver point of view, only > logically grouping of APIs. From applications point o