Hi Jiayu,
> > > Linux supports two kinds of IP identifier: fixed identifier and
> > > incremental
> > identifier, and
> > > which one to use depends on upper protocol modules. Specifically, if the
> > protocol module
> > > wants fixed identifiers, it will set SKB_GSO_TCP_FIXEDID to skb->gso_type,
Hi Konstantin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 5:55 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kavanagh, Mark B ; Tan,
> Jianfeng
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] gso/lib: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
> Hi Jiayu,
>
> > -Original Message-
>
Hi Jiayu,
> -Original Message-
> From: Hu, Jiayu
> Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 4:32 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kavanagh, Mark B ; Tan, Jianfeng
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gso/lib: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> About the IP identifier, I ch
Hi Konstantin,
About the IP identifier, I check the linux codes and have some feedbacks inline.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:38:33AM +0800, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hu, Jiayu
> > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 3:16 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Ka
---
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev, Konstantin
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:39 AM
>> To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; Hu, Jiayu
>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] gso/lib: add
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:39 AM
> To: Kavanagh, Mark B ; Hu, Jiayu
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] gso/lib: add
Hi Mark,
> >> > +
> >> > +void
> >> > +gso_parse_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt)
> >>
> >> There is a function rte_net_get_ptype() that supposed to provide similar
> >functionality.
> >> So we probably don't need to create a new SW parse function here, instead
> >would be better
> >> to reuse (and up
>From: Hu, Jiayu
>Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 3:56 AM
>To: Ananyev, Konstantin
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kavanagh, Mark B ; Tan, Jianfeng
>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gso/lib: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
>Hi Konstantin,
>
>Thanks for your important suggestions. My feedbacks are inline.
>
>On Wed, Aug
Hi Konstantin,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:38:33AM +0800, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hu, Jiayu
> > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 3:16 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Kavanagh, Mark B ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> > ; Tan, Jianfeng
> > ; Hu, Jiayu
> > Sub
Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for your important suggestions. My feedbacks are inline.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:38:33AM +0800, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hu, Jiayu
> > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 3:16 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Kavanagh, Mark B ;
> -Original Message-
> From: Hu, Jiayu
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 3:16 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Kavanagh, Mark B ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Tan, Jianfeng
> ; Hu, Jiayu
> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] gso/lib: add TCP/IPv4 GSO support
>
> This patch adds GSO support for TCP/IPv4 packets
This patch adds GSO support for TCP/IPv4 packets. Supported packets
may include a single VLAN tag. TCP/IPv4 GSO assumes that all input
packets have correct checksums, and doesn't update checksums for output
packets (the responsibility for this lies with the application).
Additionally, TCP/IPv4 GSO
12 matches
Mail list logo
