On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:42:36PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:37 PM David Marchand
><[1]david.march...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 12:55 PM Bruce Richardson
><[2]bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Since we have the version numb
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:37:08PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 12:55 PM Bruce Richardson
><[1]bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Since we have the version number in a separate file at the root
> level,
> we should not need to duplicate this in rt
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:37 PM David Marchand
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 12:55 PM Bruce Richardson <
> bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Since we have the version number in a separate file at the root level,
>> we should not need to duplicate this in rte_version.h too. Best
>> appr
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 12:55 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
> Since we have the version number in a separate file at the root level,
> we should not need to duplicate this in rte_version.h too. Best
> approach here is to move the macros for specifying the year/month/etc.
> parts from the version head
Since we have the version number in a separate file at the root level,
we should not need to duplicate this in rte_version.h too. Best
approach here is to move the macros for specifying the year/month/etc.
parts from the version header file to the build config file - leaving
the other utility macro
5 matches
Mail list logo
