On 6/10/2017 8:35 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 26/05/2017 18:11, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> Device name resides in two different locations, in rte_device->name and
>>> in ethernet device private data.
>>
>> Yes would be nice to remove the name from rte_e
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 26/05/2017 18:11, Ferruh Yigit:
>> Device name resides in two different locations, in rte_device->name and
>> in ethernet device private data.
>
> Yes would be nice to remove the name from rte_eth_dev_data.
>
I wonder if this is really the
On 6/9/2017 2:52 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 26/05/2017 18:11, Ferruh Yigit:
>> Device name resides in two different locations, in rte_device->name and
>> in ethernet device private data.
>
> Yes would be nice to remove the name from rte_eth_dev_data.
>
>> For now, the copy in the ethernet devic
26/05/2017 18:11, Ferruh Yigit:
> Device name resides in two different locations, in rte_device->name and
> in ethernet device private data.
Yes would be nice to remove the name from rte_eth_dev_data.
> For now, the copy in the ethernet device private data is required for
> multi process support,
Device name resides in two different locations, in rte_device->name and
in ethernet device private data.
For now, the copy in the ethernet device private data is required for
multi process support, the name is the how secondary process finds about
primary process device.
But for drivers there is
5 matches
Mail list logo