Hi Pawel,
On 02/24/2015 12:12 PM, Wodkowski, PawelX wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:39 AM
>> To: Wodkowski, PawelX; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [
Hi Pawel,
On 02/23/2015 03:09 PM, Pawel Wodkowski wrote:
> Declaration for function pointer should be
> typedef ret_type (*type_name)(args...)
> not
> typedef ret_type (type_name)(args...)
>
> although compiler treat both of them the same, the static analysis tool
> like klocwork complain about th
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:39 AM
> To: Wodkowski, PawelX; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] rte_timer: fix invalid declaration of
> rte_timer_cb_t
>
> Hi P
Declaration for function pointer should be
typedef ret_type (*type_name)(args...)
not
typedef ret_type (type_name)(args...)
although compiler treat both of them the same, the static analysis tool
like klocwork complain about that.
Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski
---
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.h
4 matches
Mail list logo