On 4/5/2019 3:55 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 5/22/2018 11:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 12/12/2017 11:05, Nikhil Agarwal:
>>> Currently, if the rte_eth_rx_burst() function returns a value less than
>>> *nb_pkts*, the application will assume that no more packets are present.
>>>
>>> Some of the
On 5/22/2018 11:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 12/12/2017 11:05, Nikhil Agarwal:
>> Currently, if the rte_eth_rx_burst() function returns a value less than
>> *nb_pkts*, the application will assume that no more packets are present.
>>
>> Some of the hw queue based hardware can only support smalle
12/12/2017 11:05, Nikhil Agarwal:
> Currently, if the rte_eth_rx_burst() function returns a value less than
> *nb_pkts*, the application will assume that no more packets are present.
>
> Some of the hw queue based hardware can only support smaller burst for RX
> and TX and thus break the expectat
On Wednesday 13 December 2017 06:22 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Shreyansh Jain [mailto:shreyansh.j...@nxp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 1:44 PM
To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Matan Azrad
; Nikhil Agarwal
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hunt, David ; nikhil.agar...@nx
Matan Azrad
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 10:46 AM
> >> To: Nikhil Agarwal ; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: Hunt, David ; nikhil.agar...@nxp.com;
> >> hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Yigit, Ferruh
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ethdev: add max burst
...@nxp.com; Yigit, Ferruh
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ethdev: add max burst size to device info
Hi Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nikhil Agarwal
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 12:05 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: david.h...@intel.com
g
> > Cc: david.h...@intel.com; nikhil.agar...@nxp.com;
> > hemant.agra...@nxp.com; ferruh.yi...@intel.com
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ethdev: add max burst size to device info
> >
> > Currently, if the rte_eth_rx_burst() function returns a value less than
> > *nb_p
t; Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ethdev: add max burst size to device info
>
> Currently, if the rte_eth_rx_burst() function returns a value less than
> *nb_pkts*, the application will assume that no more packets are present.
>
> Some of the hw queue based hardware can only suppo
Currently, if the rte_eth_rx_burst() function returns a value less than
*nb_pkts*, the application will assume that no more packets are present.
Some of the hw queue based hardware can only support smaller burst for RX
and TX and thus break the expectation of the rx_burst API.
This patch adds su
9 matches
Mail list logo
