> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 2:23 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian; Azarewicz, PiotrX T; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ip_frag: fix creating ipv6 fragment
> extension header
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 12:22 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Azarewicz, PiotrX T; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ip_frag: fix creating ipv6 fragment
> extension header
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev,
> Konstantin
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 6:51 PM
> To: Azarewicz, PiotrX T; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ip_frag: fix creating ipv6 fragment
> ext
Hi Piotr,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Piotr
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 3:13 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ip_frag: fix creating ipv6 fragment extension
> header
>
&g
Konstantin,
What do you think about this issue and the patch?
Thanks,
Cristian
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Piotr
> Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 3:13 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ip_fra
From: Piotr Azarewicz
Previous implementation won't work on every environment. The order of
allocation of bit-fields within a unit (high-order to low-order or
low-order to high-order) is implementation-defined.
Solution: used bytes instead of bit fields.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Azarewicz
---
lib/
6 matches
Mail list logo
