On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:35:16PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 26/01/2021 16:32, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:07:22PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > When removing the label "arm_cross_build_getting_the_prerequisite_library"
> > > in the rework of cross_build_dpdk_for_ar
26/01/2021 16:32, David Marchand:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:08 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > When removing the label "arm_cross_build_getting_the_prerequisite_library"
> > in the rework of cross_build_dpdk_for_arm64.rst,
> > the reference to this section got broken.
> > It went unnoticed bec
26/01/2021 16:32, Bruce Richardson:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:07:22PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > When removing the label "arm_cross_build_getting_the_prerequisite_library"
> > in the rework of cross_build_dpdk_for_arm64.rst,
> > the reference to this section got broken.
> > It went unnoti
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:08 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> When removing the label "arm_cross_build_getting_the_prerequisite_library"
> in the rework of cross_build_dpdk_for_arm64.rst,
> the reference to this section got broken.
> It went unnoticed because "ninja -C doc" does not regenerate the fi
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:07:22PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> When removing the label "arm_cross_build_getting_the_prerequisite_library"
> in the rework of cross_build_dpdk_for_arm64.rst,
> the reference to this section got broken.
> It went unnoticed because "ninja -C doc" does not regenerate
When removing the label "arm_cross_build_getting_the_prerequisite_library"
in the rework of cross_build_dpdk_for_arm64.rst,
the reference to this section got broken.
It went unnoticed because "ninja -C doc" does not regenerate the file
which is referencing the changed file.
Fixes: eb0e12c0c299 ("d
6 matches
Mail list logo