Hi Konstantin,
On 11/12/2014 06:21 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>> This patch introduces 2 new functions rte_get_rx_ol_flag_name()
>>> and rte_get_tx_ol_flag_name() that returns the name of a flag from
>>> its mask. It also fixes rxonly.c to use this new functions and to
>>> display the proper
> -Original Message-
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 5:30 PM
> To: Olivier Matz
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Walukiewicz, Miroslaw; Liu, Jijiang; Liu, Yong; jigsaw
> at gmail.com; Ananyev, Konstantin
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] mbuf: add functions to get the name o
Hi Bruce,
Thank you for the review.
On 11/10/2014 06:29 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * Bit Mask to indicate what bits required for building TX context
>
> I don't understand this first line - is it accidentally included?
Right, it's a mistake, I'll remove this line.
>> + * Get the
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:59:20PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> In test-pmd (rxonly.c), the code is able to dump the list of ol_flags.
> The issue is that the list of flags in the application has to be
> synchronized with the flags defined in rte_mbuf.h.
>
> This patch introduces 2 new functions r
In test-pmd (rxonly.c), the code is able to dump the list of ol_flags.
The issue is that the list of flags in the application has to be
synchronized with the flags defined in rte_mbuf.h.
This patch introduces 2 new functions rte_get_rx_ol_flag_name()
and rte_get_tx_ol_flag_name() that returns the
5 matches
Mail list logo
