Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/13] net/sfc: factor out libefx-based Rx datapath

2017-03-13 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 03/05/2017 12:05 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: On 3/2/2017 7:07 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: Split control and datapath to make datapath substitutable and possibly reusable with alternative control path. Does it make sense to document how alternative control path can be used? Possibility to use a

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/13] net/sfc: factor out libefx-based Rx datapath

2017-03-04 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 3/2/2017 7:07 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > Split control and datapath to make datapath substitutable and > possibly reusable with alternative control path. Does it make sense to document how alternative control path can be used? > > libefx-based Rx datapath is bound to libefx control path, b

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/13] net/sfc: factor out libefx-based Rx datapath

2017-03-01 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
Split control and datapath to make datapath substitutable and possibly reusable with alternative control path. libefx-based Rx datapath is bound to libefx control path, but other datapaths should be possible to use with alternative control path(s). Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko --- doc/guides