Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/21] net/ixgbe/base: change in the condition for response HI

Hi Ferruh > -Original Message- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 7:59 PM > To: Sun, GuinanX ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Mateusz Kowalski > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/21] net/ixgbe/base: change in the condition > for response HI > > On 6/

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/21] net/ixgbe/base: change in the condition for response HI

> -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit > Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 19:59 > To: Sun, GuinanX ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Mateusz Kowalski > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/21] net/ixgbe/base: change in the > condition for response HI Don&#x

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/21] net/ixgbe/base: change in the condition for response HI

On 6/12/2020 4:23 AM, Guinan Sun wrote: > According to SGVL EAS Host interface Shadow RAM Read (0x31) > command response buffer length is stored in two bytes, > instead of one byte. For patch subject, better to say 'fix' instead of 'change' because that is what done. Previously Shadow RAM Read (0x

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/21] net/ixgbe/base: change in the condition for response HI

According to SGVL EAS Host interface Shadow RAM Read (0x31) command response buffer length is stored in two bytes, instead of one byte. Signed-off-by: Mateusz Kowalski Signed-off-by: Guinan Sun --- drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff