On 9/6/19 12:24 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 07:38:23PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
On 9/5/19 7:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 17:10:40 +0100
Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ ERROR("Failed to apply promi
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 07:38:23PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 9/5/19 7:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 17:10:40 +0100
> > Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> >
> > > + if (ret != 0) {
> > > + ERROR("Failed to apply promiscuous mode");
> > > +
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 19:49:09 +0300
Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 9/5/19 7:40 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 17:10:40 +0100
> > Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> >
> >> From: Ivan Ilchenko
> >>
> >> rte_eth_promiscuous_enable()/rte_eth_promiscuous_disable() return
> >> value was cha
On 9/5/19 7:40 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 17:10:40 +0100
Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
From: Ivan Ilchenko
rte_eth_promiscuous_enable()/rte_eth_promiscuous_disable() return
value was changed from void to int, so this patch modify usage
of these functions across net/failsafe ac
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 17:10:40 +0100
Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> From: Ivan Ilchenko
>
> rte_eth_promiscuous_enable()/rte_eth_promiscuous_disable() return
> value was changed from void to int, so this patch modify usage
> of these functions across net/failsafe according to new return type.
>
> Try
On 9/5/19 7:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 17:10:40 +0100
Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ ERROR("Failed to apply promiscuous mode");
+ return ret;
+ }
Just return the error as normal and le
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 17:10:40 +0100
Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + ERROR("Failed to apply promiscuous mode");
> + return ret;
> + }
Just return the error as normal and let caller deal with it.
Additional logging is no
On 9/5/19 7:25 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:10:40PM +0100, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
From: Ivan Ilchenko
rte_eth_promiscuous_enable()/rte_eth_promiscuous_disable() return
value was changed from void to int, so this patch modify usage
of these functions across net/fails
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:10:40PM +0100, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> From: Ivan Ilchenko
>
> rte_eth_promiscuous_enable()/rte_eth_promiscuous_disable() return
> value was changed from void to int, so this patch modify usage
> of these functions across net/failsafe according to new return type
From: Ivan Ilchenko
rte_eth_promiscuous_enable()/rte_eth_promiscuous_disable() return
value was changed from void to int, so this patch modify usage
of these functions across net/failsafe according to new return type.
Try to keep promiscuous mode consistent across all active
devices in the case
10 matches
Mail list logo