On 20/6/19 2:35 μ.μ., Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Nikos,
>
> On 6/19/19 5:14 PM, Nikos Dragazis wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> this patch series introduces the concept of the virtio-vhost-user
>> transport. This is actually a revised version of an earlier RFC
>> implementation that has been proposed
On 20/6/19 2:32 μ.μ., Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 19.06.2019 18:14, Nikos Dragazis wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
> Hi. I didn't look at the code, just a few comments inline.
>
>> this patch series introduces the concept of the virtio-vhost-user
>> transport. This is actually a revised version of an earlier
Hi Nikos,
On 6/19/19 5:14 PM, Nikos Dragazis wrote:
Hi everyone,
this patch series introduces the concept of the virtio-vhost-user
transport. This is actually a revised version of an earlier RFC
implementation that has been proposed by Stefan Hajnoczi [1]. Though
this is a great feature, it see
On 19.06.2019 18:14, Nikos Dragazis wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi. I didn't look at the code, just a few comments inline.
>
> this patch series introduces the concept of the virtio-vhost-user
> transport. This is actually a revised version of an earlier RFC
> implementation that has been proposed by
Hi everyone,
this patch series introduces the concept of the virtio-vhost-user
transport. This is actually a revised version of an earlier RFC
implementation that has been proposed by Stefan Hajnoczi [1]. Though
this is a great feature, it seems to have been stalled, so I’d like to
restart the con
5 matches
Mail list logo