? 2016/10/10 16:03, Yuanhan Liu ??:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 06:46:44PM +0800, linhaifeng wrote:
>> ? 2016/8/23 16:10, Yuanhan Liu ??:
>>> The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
>>> desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly.
>>
>> Is there pro
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 06:46:44PM +0800, linhaifeng wrote:
> ? 2016/8/23 16:10, Yuanhan Liu ??:
> > The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
> > desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly.
>
> Is there problem when push vlan to the mbuf which re
Of Yuanhan Liu
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 4:11 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Maxime Coquelin ; Yuanhan Liu at linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support
>
> This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to
? 2016/8/23 16:10, Yuanhan Liu ??:
> The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
> desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly.
Is there problem when push vlan to the mbuf which reference the desc buf addr
directly?
We know if guest use virtio_net(k
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:57:52AM +, Xu, Qian Q wrote:
> Btw, some good news: if I run a simple dequeue workload (running rxonly in
> vhost-pmd and runnin txonly in guest testpmd), it yields ~50% performance
> boost for packet size 1518B, but this case is without NIC.
> And similar case as
essage-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 4:33 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu ; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support
I just ran a PVP test, nic receive packets then forwards to vhost PM
dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 4:11 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Maxime Coquelin ; Yuanhan Liu
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support
This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to patch 4:
vhost: ad
BTW, I really appreicate your efforts on reviewing this patchset.
It would be great if you could take some time to review my another
patchset :)
[PATCH 0/7] vhost: vhost-cuse removal and code path refactoring
It touchs a large of code base, that I wish I could apply it ASAP.
So that the chan
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:18:40PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
> On 08/23/2016 10:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> >This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to
> >patch 4: vhost: add Tx zero copy.
> >
> >The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
On 08/23/2016 04:53 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> BTW, I really appreicate your efforts on reviewing this patchset.
>
> It would be great if you could take some time to review my another
> patchset :)
>
> [PATCH 0/7] vhost: vhost-cuse removal and code path refactoring
>
> It touchs a large of code
On 08/23/2016 10:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to
> patch 4: vhost: add Tx zero copy.
>
> The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
> desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly.
>
>
This patch set enables vhost Tx zero copy. The majority work goes to
patch 4: vhost: add Tx zero copy.
The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the
desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly.
The major issue behind that is how and when to update the
12 matches
Mail list logo
