Hi Aaron,
>-Original Message-
>From: Aaron Conole
>Sent: Wednesday 31 March 2021 15:43
>To: Doherty, Declan
>Cc: Power, Ciara ; dev@dpdk.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] test: refactor crypto unit test framework
>
>"Doherty, Declan" writes:
>
>> Hey Aaron,
>>
>> based on the work you've b
>-Original Message-
>From: Ruifeng Wang
>Sent: Thursday 1 April 2021 04:14
>To: Power, Ciara ; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Doherty, Declan ; nd
>Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] test: refactor crypto unit test framework
>
>> -Original Message-
>> Fr
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Ciara Power
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 10:33 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: declan.dohe...@intel.com; Ciara Power
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] test: refactor crypto unit test framework
>
> The current crypto un
"Doherty, Declan" writes:
> Hey Aaron,
>
> based on the work you've been doing on the unit test documentation we
> would appreciate if you could take a look over this patchset and get
> your thoughts. The primary drive here is to make it easier to get a
> clear picture of what is being executed i
Hey Aaron,
based on the work you've been doing on the unit test documentation we
would appreciate if you could take a look over this patchset and get
your thoughts. The primary drive here is to make it easier to get a
clear picture of what is being executed in the cryptodev testsuite, as
at t
The current crypto unit test framework is not granular enough to
accurately track unit test results. This is caused by one testcase
in a suite actually running multiple testcases, but only returning
one result.
The approach taken in this patchset allows a test suite have either a
list of sub-test
6 matches
Mail list logo
