Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] remove unused code of DPDK version

2017-08-30 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 8/23/2017 9:44 AM, Beilei Xing wrote: > Since there's no specific version number to distinguish > DPDK pf and Linux kernel pf, DPDK vf won't recognize if > host is DPDK pf or kernel pf. The specific virtual channel > commands for DPDK pf and code of DPDK version can be deleted. > > Beilei Xing

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] remove unused code of DPDK version

2017-08-28 Thread Xing, Beilei
Hi Ferruh, > -Original Message- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 7:22 PM > To: Xing, Beilei ; Wu, Jingjing > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] remove unused code of DPDK version > > On 8/23/2017 9:44 AM, Beilei Xing wro

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] remove unused code of DPDK version

2017-08-28 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 8/23/2017 9:44 AM, Beilei Xing wrote: > Since there's no specific version number to distinguish > DPDK pf and Linux kernel pf, DPDK vf won't recognize if > host is DPDK pf or kernel pf. The specific virtual channel > commands for DPDK pf and code of DPDK version can be deleted. Is DPDK i40e PF

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] remove unused code of DPDK version

2017-08-23 Thread Beilei Xing
Since there's no specific version number to distinguish DPDK pf and Linux kernel pf, DPDK vf won't recognize if host is DPDK pf or kernel pf. The specific virtual channel commands for DPDK pf and code of DPDK version can be deleted. Beilei Xing (3): net/i40e: remove virtual channel command for V