>> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:10 AM
>> To: Nicol?s Pernas Maradei; Mcnamara, John
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Tero Aho
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] pcap pmd improvements
>>
>> Please Nicolas, John,
>> could we have a review of these patches?
> Will do.
>
> John.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tero Aho
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:43 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] pcap pmd improvements
>
> We have found it convenient to use pcap interfaces
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:10 AM
> To: Nicol?s Pernas Maradei; Mcnamara, John
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Tero Aho
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] pcap pmd improvements
>
&
Please Nicolas, John,
could we have a review of these patches?
Thanks
2015-02-27 15:42, Tero Aho:
> We have found it convenient to use pcap interfaces in early development
> when speed does not matter. However, pcap interfaces use fixed values
> for some properties like link status which makes it
We have found it convenient to use pcap interfaces in early development
when speed does not matter. However, pcap interfaces use fixed values
for some properties like link status which makes it hard to simulate
certain conditions.
Here's series of small improvements we have originally used on top
2015-02-27 15:42, Tero Aho:
> We have found it convenient to use pcap interfaces in early development
> when speed does not matter. However, pcap interfaces use fixed values
> for some properties like link status which makes it hard to simulate
> certain conditions.
>
> Here's series of small impr
6 matches
Mail list logo