2014-09-18 15:31, De Lara Guarch, Pablo:
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> > Thread safe hash tables seem to me like a configuration option rather than
> > a new
> > library. Instead of creating a whole new library (with a new API and ABI
> > to maintain, why not just add th
Hi Neil,
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 1:21 PM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] New Thread Safe Hash Library
>
> On Thu, Se
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:34:28 +0100
Pablo de Lara wrote:
> This is an alternative hash implementation to the existing hash library.
> This patch set provides a thread safe hash implementation, it allows users
> to use multiple readers/writers working on a same hash table.
> Main differences betw
v at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] New Thread Safe Hash Library
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:34:28AM +0100, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> > > This is an alternative hash implementation to the existing hash library.
> > > This patch set provides
This is an alternative hash implementation to the existing hash library.
This patch set provides a thread safe hash implementation, it allows users
to use multiple readers/writers working on a same hash table.
Main differences between the previous and the new implementation are:
- Multiple reade
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:34:28AM +0100, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> This is an alternative hash implementation to the existing hash library.
> This patch set provides a thread safe hash implementation, it allows users
> to use multiple readers/writers working on a same hash table.
> Main differences
6 matches
Mail list logo
