> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Coquelin
> Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 11:43 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu ; Maxime Coquelin
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xia, Chenbo ; Wang, Yinan
> ; David Marchand
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] provide thread unsafe async registration functions
>
> Hi Jiayu,
>
> On
Hi Jiayu,
On 6/29/21 7:36 AM, Hu, Jiayu wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Maxime Coquelin
>> Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 9:20 PM
>> To: Hu, Jiayu ; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo ;
>> Wang, Yinan
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] provide thread u
Hi Maxime,
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Coquelin
> Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 9:20 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo ;
> Wang, Yinan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] provide thread unsafe async registration functions
>
> Hi Jiayu,
>
> On 6
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Coquelin
> Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 9:20 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo ;
> Wang, Yinan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] provide thread unsafe async registration functions
>
> Hi Jiayu,
>
> On 6/7/21 10:0
Hi Jiayu,
On 6/7/21 10:07 AM, Hu, Jiayu wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Maxime Coquelin
>> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 3:25 PM
>> To: Hu, Jiayu ; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo ;
>> Wang, Yinan
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] provide thread u
Hi Maxime,
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Coquelin
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 3:25 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo ;
> Wang, Yinan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] provide thread unsafe async registration functions
>
> Sorry, for previous
Sorry, for previous blank reply.
On 5/28/21 10:11 AM, Jiayu Hu wrote:
> Lock protection is needed during the vhost notifies the application of
> device readiness, so the first patch is to add lock protection. After
> performing locking, existed async vhost registration functions will cause
> deadl
On 5/28/21 10:11 AM, Jiayu Hu wrote:
> Lock protection is needed during the vhost notifies the application of
> device readiness, so the first patch is to add lock protection. After
> performing locking, existed async vhost registration functions will cause
> deadlock, as they acquire lock too.
Lock protection is needed during the vhost notifies the application of
device readiness, so the first patch is to add lock protection. After
performing locking, existed async vhost registration functions will cause
deadlock, as they acquire lock too. So the second patch is to provide
unsafe registr
9 matches
Mail list logo
