Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] make a couple eth_dev_ops const

2017-01-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-12 21:54, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/12/2017 7:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Really trivial patches. > > Patches are not in patchwork, and not in the mail list. > > > I also consider this a litmus test of how long it takes DPDK > > project to merge trivial maintaince patches. This is a n

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] make a couple eth_dev_ops const

2017-01-12 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/12/2017 7:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Really trivial patches. Patches are not in patchwork, and not in the mail list. > > I also consider this a litmus test of how long it takes DPDK > project to merge trivial maintaince patches. > > Stephen Hemminger (2): > bnx: make eth_dev_ops c

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] make a couple eth_dev_ops const

2017-01-12 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Really trivial patches. I also consider this a litmus test of how long it takes DPDK project to merge trivial maintaince patches. Stephen Hemminger (2): bnx: make eth_dev_ops const ena: make eth_dev_ops const drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c | 2 +- 2 fi