> On Mar 29, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Morten Brørup wrote:
>
> I have two points to this discussion:
>
> GRO/LRO must be disabled by default! Truly transparent network appliances,
> such as classic Layer 3 routers and Layer 2 switches (and our SmartShare
> StraightShaper appliance), may not want to
I have two points to this discussion:
GRO/LRO must be disabled by default! Truly transparent network appliances, such
as classic Layer 3 routers and Layer 2 switches (and our SmartShare
StraightShaper appliance), may not want to merge multiple smaller packets into
one larger packet, regardless
chardson, Bruce ; Stephen Hemminger
>> ; Yigit, Ferruh ;
>> dev@dpdk.org; Liang, Cunming ; Thomas
>> Monjalon
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 24, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>>
&
s
> Monjalon
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
>
>
> > On Mar 24, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Mar 24, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Olivier Matz
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 24 Mar
> On Mar 24, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:37:04 +, "Wiles, Keith"
>> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin
wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
Yep, th
> On Mar 24, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:37:04 +, "Wiles, Keith"
> wrote:
>>> On Mar 24, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> [...]
>
>>> Yep, that's what my take from the beginning:
>>> Let's develop a librte_gro firs
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:37:04 +, "Wiles, Keith"
wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
[...]
> > Yep, that's what my take from the beginning:
> > Let's develop a librte_gro first and make it successful, then we can think
> > should
> > we (
>> ; Stephen Hemminger
>> ; Yigit, Ferruh ;
>> dev@dpdk.org; Liang, Cunming ; Thomas Monjalon
>>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:22:30PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Fr
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:22:30PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:18:48AM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> > > >> I think that having a separate library for GRO is a step i
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:22:30PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:18:48AM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> > >> I think that having a separate library for GRO is a step in a right
> > >> direction.
> > >>> From my perspective - it provides a clean and flexible way to use that
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:18:48AM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> >> I think that having a separate library for GRO is a step in a right
> >> direction.
> >>> From my perspective - it provides a clean and flexible way to use that
> >>> feature.
> >> If later someone would like to put GRO into ethde
;>> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:25 AM
>>>>> To: Wiles, Keith
>>>>> Cc: Yuanhan Liu ; Richardson, Bruce
>>>>> ; Yigit, Ferruh ;
>>>>> Ananyev, Konstantin
>>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] l
ith
> > > > Cc: Yuanhan Liu ; Richardson, Bruce
> > > > ; Yigit, Ferruh ;
> > > > Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] lib: add TCP IPv4 GRO support
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:29:06PM
Generic Receive Offload (GRO) is a widely used SW offloading technique,
which reassemble small packets into large ones, to reduce processing
overheads for upper layer applications in receiving side, like networking
stack. Therefore, we propose to add GRO support in DPDK.
DPDK GRO is implemented as
14 matches
Mail list logo
