Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Multiple Pktmbuf mempool support

2017-10-10 Thread Hemant Agrawal
On 10/10/2017 7:45 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 25/09/2017 12:24, Olivier MATZ: Hi Hemant, On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:43:36PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote: On 7/4/2017 5:52 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: This patch is in addition to the patch series[1] submitted by Santosh to allow application to set

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Multiple Pktmbuf mempool support

2017-10-10 Thread Thomas Monjalon
25/09/2017 12:24, Olivier MATZ: > Hi Hemant, > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:43:36PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > On 7/4/2017 5:52 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > > This patch is in addition to the patch series[1] submitted by > > > Santosh to allow application to set mempool handle. > > > > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Multiple Pktmbuf mempool support

2017-09-25 Thread Olivier MATZ
Hi Hemant, On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:43:36PM +0530, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > On 7/4/2017 5:52 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > This patch is in addition to the patch series[1] submitted by > > Santosh to allow application to set mempool handle. > > > > The existing pktmbuf pool create api only suppo

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Multiple Pktmbuf mempool support

2017-09-22 Thread Hemant Agrawal
Hi Olivier, Any opinion on this patchset? Regards, Hemant On 7/4/2017 5:52 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: This patch is in addition to the patch series[1] submitted by Santosh to allow application to set mempool handle. The existing pktmbuf pool create api only support the internal use of "

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Multiple Pktmbuf mempool support

2017-07-04 Thread Hemant Agrawal
This patch is in addition to the patch series[1] submitted by Santosh to allow application to set mempool handle. The existing pktmbuf pool create api only support the internal use of "CONFIG_RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS", which assumes that the HW can only support one type of mempool for packet