Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Mark shared pthread mutex

2021-04-16 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 3/16/2021 4:28 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:27:20 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: This fixes two places where pthread_mutex was being unsafely used between primary secondary process. These patches are necessary but not sufficient to address Bug 662 Stephen Hemminger

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Mark shared pthread mutex

2021-03-16 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:27:20 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This fixes two places where pthread_mutex was being unsafely > used between primary secondary process. > > These patches are necessary but not sufficient to address Bug 662 > > Stephen Hemminger (2): > ethdev: make flow API primary

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Mark shared pthread mutex

2021-03-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:27:20 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This fixes two places where pthread_mutex was being unsafely > used between primary secondary process. > > These patches are necessary but not sufficient to address Bug 662 > > Stephen Hemminger (2): > ethdev: make flow API primary

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Mark shared pthread mutex

2021-03-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
This fixes two places where pthread_mutex was being unsafely used between primary secondary process. These patches are necessary but not sufficient to address Bug 662 Stephen Hemminger (2): ethdev: make flow API primary/secondary process safe net/failsafe: fix primary/secondary mutex driver