On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Bruce Richardson
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:25:07AM -0500, Kyle Larose wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Tom Kiely wrote:
>> > Sure.
>> >Tom
>> >
>> >
>> > On 03/04/2016 06:16 AM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 2/23/2016 12:23 AM, Tom Kiely
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:25:07AM -0500, Kyle Larose wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Tom Kiely wrote:
> > Sure.
> >Tom
> >
> >
> > On 03/04/2016 06:16 AM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/23/2016 12:23 AM, Tom Kiely wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> Sorry I missed the last few messa
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Tom Kiely wrote:
> Sure.
>Tom
>
>
> On 03/04/2016 06:16 AM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>>
>> On 2/23/2016 12:23 AM, Tom Kiely wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Sorry I missed the last few messages until now. I'm happy with
>>> just removing the "if". Kyle, when you say you fi
Sure.
Tom
On 03/04/2016 06:16 AM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 2/23/2016 12:23 AM, Tom Kiely wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Sorry I missed the last few messages until now. I'm happy with
>> just removing the "if". Kyle, when you say you fixed it, do you mean
>> that you will push the patch or have already d
On 2/23/2016 12:23 AM, Tom Kiely wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry I missed the last few messages until now. I'm happy with
> just removing the "if". Kyle, when you say you fixed it, do you mean
> that you will push the patch or have already done so ?
>Thanks,
>Tom
Could you please send the pat
Virtio has an mbuf descriptor ring containing mbufs to be used for receiving
traffic. When the host queues traffic to be sent to the guest, it consumes
these descriptors. If none exist, it discards the packet.
The virtio pmd allocates mbufs to the descriptor ring every time it
succesfully receives
On 2/23/2016 12:23 AM, Tom Kiely wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry I missed the last few messages until now. I'm happy with
> just removing the "if". Kyle, when you say you fixed it, do you mean
> that you will push the patch or have already done so ?
>Thanks,
>Tom
>
> On 02/18/2016 02:03 PM, Ky
Hi,
Sorry I missed the last few messages until now. I'm happy with just
removing the "if". Kyle, when you say you fixed it, do you mean that you
will push the patch or have already done so ?
Thanks,
Tom
On 02/18/2016 02:03 PM, Kyle Larose wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:13 AM,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 7:18 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/25/2015 05:32 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2015 5:33 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
mbuf exhaustion is present, the rx ring ends up
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 07:13:04AM +, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 7:18 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/25/2015 05:32 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> >> On 11/13/2015 5:33 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
> >>> If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
> >>> mbuf exhaustion is present, the
On 12/17/2015 7:18 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
>
>
> On 11/25/2015 05:32 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>> On 11/13/2015 5:33 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
>>> If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
>>> mbuf exhaustion is present, the rx ring ends up with
>>> no available descriptors. Thus no packets are rece
On 11/25/2015 05:32 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 5:33 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
>> If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
>> mbuf exhaustion is present, the rx ring ends up with
>> no available descriptors. Thus no packets are received
>> on that ring. Since descriptor refill is
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. I have been occupied on another critical issue.
I'll look at this today.
Tom
On 12/17/2015 04:47 AM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 11/26/2015 1:33 AM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>> On 11/13/2015 5:33 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
>>> If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
>
On 11/26/2015 1:33 AM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 5:33 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
>> If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
>> mbuf exhaustion is present, the rx ring ends up with
>> no available descriptors. Thus no packets are received
>> on that ring. Since descriptor refill is pe
On 11/13/2015 5:33 PM, Tom Kiely wrote:
> If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
> mbuf exhaustion is present, the rx ring ends up with
> no available descriptors. Thus no packets are received
> on that ring. Since descriptor refill is performed post
> rx descriptor processing, in this
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:20:22PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Any review, please?
Huawei, would you review it? Sorry that I've not read too much
code about virtio PMD driver yet.
--yliu
> 2015-11-13 09:30, Tom Kiely:
> > If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
> > mbuf
On 11/25/2015 9:47 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:20:22PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> Any review, please?
> Huawei, would you review it? Sorry that I've not read too much
> code about virtio PMD driver yet.
Np. will do it by end of this week.
>
> --yliu
>
>
>> 2015-1
Any review, please?
2015-11-13 09:30, Tom Kiely:
> If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
> mbuf exhaustion is present, the rx ring ends up with
> no available descriptors. Thus no packets are received
> on that ring. Since descriptor refill is performed post
> rx descriptor processin
If all rx descriptors are processed while transient
mbuf exhaustion is present, the rx ring ends up with
no available descriptors. Thus no packets are received
on that ring. Since descriptor refill is performed post
rx descriptor processing, in this case no refill is
ever subsequently performed res
19 matches
Mail list logo
