On 4/29/20 4:59 AM, Xuan Ding wrote:
> In server mode, virtio-user inits under the assumption that vhost-user
> supports a list of features. However, this could be problematic when
> in_order feature is negotiated but not supported by vhost-user when
> enables dequeue_zero_copy later.
>
> Add h
On 4/29/20 4:59 AM, Xuan Ding wrote:
> In server mode, virtio-user inits under the assumption that vhost-user
> supports a list of features. However, this could be problematic when
> in_order feature is negotiated but not supported by vhost-user when
> enables dequeue_zero_copy later.
>
> Add h
gt; Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ding, Xuan
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: zero_copy incompatible with client mode
>>
>> In server mode, virtio-user inits under the assumption that vhost-user
>> supports a
>> list of features. However, this could be problematic when in_o
Tested-by: Yinan Wang
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Xuan Ding
> Sent: 2020年4月29日 11:00
> To: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Wang, Zhihong ;
> Ye, Xiaolong
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ding, Xuan
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: zero_copy incompatible wit
In server mode, virtio-user inits under the assumption that vhost-user
supports a list of features. However, this could be problematic when
in_order feature is negotiated but not supported by vhost-user when
enables dequeue_zero_copy later.
Add handling when vhost-user enables dequeue_zero_copy as
5 matches
Mail list logo