Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among multi processes

rg >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among >> multi processes >> >> On 03/10, Itsuro Oda wrote: >>> Currently, iotlb cache name is comprised of vid and virtqueue >>> index. For example, "iotlb_cache_0_0". Becau

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among multi processes

> -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Ye Xiaolong > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 11:32 AM > To: Itsuro Oda > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Wang, Zhihong > ; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: make iotlb cache name

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among multi processes

On 03/10, Itsuro Oda wrote: >Currently, iotlb cache name is comprised of vid and virtqueue >index. For example, "iotlb_cache_0_0". Because vid is assigned >per process, iotlb cache name is not unique among multi processes. >For example a secondary process uses a vhost >(ex. eth_vhost0,iface=/tmp/so

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among multi processes

Currently, iotlb cache name is comprised of vid and virtqueue index. For example, "iotlb_cache_0_0". Because vid is assigned per process, iotlb cache name is not unique among multi processes. For example a secondary process uses a vhost (ex. eth_vhost0,iface=/tmp/sock0) and another secondary proces