02/12/2019 16:29, David Marchand:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
> >
> > --- a/VERSION
> > +++ b/VERSION
> > @@ -1 +1 @@
> > -19.11.0
> > +20.02-rc0
>
> 20.02.0-rc0 ?
>
>
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Monday 2 December 2019 16:13
> To: Kinsella, Ray
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce ; David Marchand
> ; dev ; Neil Horman
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0
>
> 02/12/2019 16:43, Kinsella
QQ.
What do you plan to do then, when you go for longer periods of ABI stability?
Ray K
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Monday 2 December 2019 15:40
> To: David Marchand
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev ; Neil
> Horman ; Kinsella, Ray
> Subject:
02/12/2019 16:43, Kinsella, Ray:
> QQ.
>
> What do you plan to do then, when you go for longer periods of ABI stability?
Very good point Ray!
For longer periods it would not mach DPDK version number.
So we keep standard scheme of increasing by +1 every quarter?
> From: Bruce Richardson
> > O
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:29:06PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
> >
> > ---
> >
> > I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2
> > for
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> Start a new release cycle with empty release notes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
>
> ---
>
> I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2
> for an easy mapping with code version:
> DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20
> libs 19.1
Start a new release cycle with empty release notes.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
---
I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2
for an easy mapping with code version:
DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20
libs 19.11 = .so.20.0
DPDK 20.02 = ABI 20
libs 20.02 = .so.20.2
7 matches
Mail list logo
