Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: rely on EAL detection for core list

2021-10-19 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:52:32AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:53 PM Bruce Richardson > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:01:36PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > > Cores count has a direct impact on the time needed to complete unit > > > tests. > > > > > > Cur

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: rely on EAL detection for core list

2021-10-19 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:53 PM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:01:36PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > Cores count has a direct impact on the time needed to complete unit > > tests. > > > > Currently, the core list used for unit test is enforced to "all cores on > > the sy

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: rely on EAL detection for core list

2021-10-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:01:36PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > Cores count has a direct impact on the time needed to complete unit > tests. > > Currently, the core list used for unit test is enforced to "all cores on > the system" with no way for (CI) users to adapt it. > On the other hand, EAL

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: rely on EAL detection for core list

2021-10-18 Thread David Marchand
Cores count has a direct impact on the time needed to complete unit tests. Currently, the core list used for unit test is enforced to "all cores on the system" with no way for (CI) users to adapt it. On the other hand, EAL default behavior (when no -c/-l option gets passed) is to start threads on