[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: Ring PMD unit test rollback

Hi Neil, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 4:03 PM > To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: Ring PMD unit test rollback > > On

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: Ring PMD unit test rollback

From: Pablo de Lara New ring PMD unit test requires extra EAL option (vdev), in order to pass, which I believe is incorrect, as this test should be focused on testing the API, without needing to pass any argument. Added again all functions that create all the ring devices necessary for the test,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: Ring PMD unit test rollback

Cc: dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: Ring PMD unit test rollback > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:46:39PM +0100, Pablo de Lara wrote: > > > From: Pablo de Lara > > > > > > New ring PMD unit test requires extra EAL option

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: Ring PMD unit test rollback

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:46:39PM +0100, Pablo de Lara wrote: > From: Pablo de Lara > > New ring PMD unit test requires extra EAL option (vdev), > in order to pass, which I believe is incorrect, as this > test should be focused on testing the API, without needing > to pass any argument. > > Add