On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:05:51AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:16:47 +0100
> David Marchand wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 6:55 AM Hemant Agrawal
> > wrote:
> > > On 1/14/2021 7:14 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:24 AM Hemant Agraw
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:16:47 +0100
David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 6:55 AM Hemant Agrawal
> wrote:
> > On 1/14/2021 7:14 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:24 AM Hemant Agrawal
> > > wrote:
> > >> Secondary process may not have all the tailq available
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 6:55 AM Hemant Agrawal
wrote:
> On 1/14/2021 7:14 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:24 AM Hemant Agrawal
> > wrote:
> >> Secondary process may not have all the tailq available for
> >> mapping, so better to ignore the error.
> >>
> >> e.g. if the pri
On 1/14/2021 7:14 PM, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:24 AM Hemant Agrawal wrote:
Secondary process may not have all the tailq available for
mapping, so better to ignore the error.
e.g. if the primary process is linked with N libs
and secondary process is linked with less num
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:24 AM Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>
> Secondary process may not have all the tailq available for
> mapping, so better to ignore the error.
>
> e.g. if the primary process is linked with N libs
> and secondary process is linked with less number of libs.
>
> dpdk-procinfo results
Secondary process may not have all the tailq available for
mapping, so better to ignore the error.
e.g. if the primary process is linked with N libs
and secondary process is linked with less number of libs.
dpdk-procinfo results into following error:
EAL: Cannot initialize tailq: VMBUS_RESOURCE_L
6 matches
Mail list logo