Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] prefetch second cacheline of mbufs on alloc

2017-02-16 Thread Olivier Matz
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:44:35 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Do we need to discuss again the prefetch calls inside DPDK > or can we definitely close this kind of request? > mbuf: http://dpdk.org/patch/4678/ > ethdev: http://dpdk.org/patch/8867/ > About the mbuf prefetch, I suggest th

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] prefetch second cacheline of mbufs on alloc

2017-02-15 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Do we need to discuss again the prefetch calls inside DPDK or can we definitely close this kind of request? mbuf: http://dpdk.org/patch/4678/ ethdev: http://dpdk.org/patch/8867/ 2015-07-20 10:02, Olivier MATZ: > Hi Thomas, > > > On 07/20/2015 03:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] prefetch second cacheline of mbufs on alloc

2015-07-20 Thread Olivier MATZ
Hi Thomas, On 07/20/2015 03:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Please Olivier, > What is the status of this patch? >From what I remember, the last mail was a comment from Konstantin on another thread (but same topic): http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-May/017633.html Regards, Olivier > > 20

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] prefetch second cacheline of mbufs on alloc

2015-07-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Please Olivier, What is the status of this patch? 2015-05-12 01:15, Paul Emmerich: > this improves the throughput of a simple tx-only application by 11% in > the full-featured ixgbe tx path and by 14% in the simple tx path. > --- > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] prefetch second cacheline of mbufs on alloc

2015-05-12 Thread Paul Emmerich
this improves the throughput of a simple tx-only application by 11% in the full-featured ixgbe tx path and by 14% in the simple tx path. --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h index ab6de67..f6895b4