Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-19 Thread Alejandro Lucero
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 12/16/2016 5:29 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > Hi, > > > > One question about this patch. I will send another patch soon which will > > require to modify the file created by this patch. So, should I use the > > dpdk-next for sending the

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-19 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/16/2016 5:29 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > Hi, > > One question about this patch. I will send another patch soon which will > require to modify the file created by this patch. So, should I use the > dpdk-next for sending the new patch or the dpdk stable branch? I guess by "dpdk stable bran

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-16 Thread Alejandro Lucero
Hi, One question about this patch. I will send another patch soon which will require to modify the file created by this patch. So, should I use the dpdk-next for sending the new patch or the dpdk stable branch? I understand that using the latter will imply some integration later, but I really do n

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-09 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/9/2016 10:00 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > That's fine. Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. > > Thank you > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Ferruh Yigit > wrote: > > On 12/6/2016 2:51 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > Then I guess I should sen

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-09 Thread Alejandro Lucero
That's fine. Thank you On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 12/6/2016 2:51 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > Then I guess I should send another version of this patch. > > I can also update the patch while applying, if you agree with following > content (simply just all =N remo

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-06 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/6/2016 2:51 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > Then I guess I should send another version of this patch. I can also update the patch while applying, if you agree with following content (simply just all =N removed): [Features] +SR-IOV = Y +Link status = Y +Link status even

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-06 Thread Alejandro Lucero
cnamara, John > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features > > > > On 12/2/2016 8:17 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero > > > --- > > > doc/guides/nics/features/nfp.ini | 25 +++

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-06 Thread Mcnamara, John
> -Original Message- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 12:08 PM > To: Alejandro Lucero ; dev@dpdk.org; > Mcnamara, John > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features > > On 12/2/2016 8:17 AM, Alejandro Lucero

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-06 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 12/2/2016 8:17 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero > --- > doc/guides/nics/features/nfp.ini | 25 + > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/nfp.ini > b/doc/guides/nics/features/nfp.ini > index d967151..dd7

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-02 Thread Mcnamara, John
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Lucero > Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 8:18 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero Acked-by: John McNamara

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] nfp: add doc about supported features

2016-12-02 Thread Alejandro Lucero
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero --- doc/guides/nics/features/nfp.ini | 25 + 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/nfp.ini b/doc/guides/nics/features/nfp.ini index d967151..dd78233 100644 --- a/doc/guides/nics/features/nfp.ini +++ b/doc/gu