On 5/24/2018 7:02 PM, Mody, Rasesh wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
>
>> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 10:22 AM
>>
>> On 5/23/2018 7:48 PM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
>>> From: Shahed Shaikh
>>>
>>> In 100G mode, we poll firmware slow path completion for every 1
>>
Hi Ferruh,
> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 10:22 AM
>
> On 5/23/2018 7:48 PM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
> > From: Shahed Shaikh
> >
> > In 100G mode, we poll firmware slow path completion for every 1
> > second, which is not enough and may result in c
On 5/23/2018 7:48 PM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
> From: Shahed Shaikh
>
> In 100G mode, we poll firmware slow path completion for every 1 second,
> which is not enough and may result in completion timeout if
> driver misses that window.
>
> Patch "eal: set affinity for control threads" exposed this iss
From: Shahed Shaikh
In 100G mode, we poll firmware slow path completion for every 1 second,
which is not enough and may result in completion timeout if
driver misses that window.
Patch "eal: set affinity for control threads" exposed this issue since
alarm callback runs in control thread context.
4 matches
Mail list logo