> On Jan 11, 2018, at 12:20 AM, Nélio Laranjeiro
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:51:53PM -0800, Yongseok Koh wrote:
>> As the dst_mac of allmulti is already masked with the mask, it has 0x01 in
>> the first octet. Checking the least significant bit only can't distinguish
>> it from broa
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:51:53PM -0800, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> As the dst_mac of allmulti is already masked with the mask, it has 0x01 in
> the first octet. Checking the least significant bit only can't distinguish
> it from broadcast or IPv6 multicast.
>
> Fixes: bb47fb6e6067 ("net/mlx5: fix flow
As the dst_mac of allmulti is already masked with the mask, it has 0x01 in
the first octet. Checking the least significant bit only can't distinguish
it from broadcast or IPv6 multicast.
Fixes: bb47fb6e6067 ("net/mlx5: fix flow type for allmulti rules")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Yongseok
3 matches
Mail list logo