Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

Hi Tao, > Thank you for your advice. Your advice is excellent. I have the same idea > with you to solve this problem. > First. Consider whether the fallback function of alamer can shorten the time. > But it seems difficult for the following reasons(If you have a good idea, > please let me kno

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

Hi Konstantin, Thank you for your advice. Your advice is excellent. I have the same idea with you to solve this problem. First. Consider whether the fallback function of alamer can shorten the time. But it seems difficult for the following reasons(If you have a good idea, please let me know):

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

Hi, > IXGBE link status task use rte alarm thread in old implementation. > Sometime ixgbe link status task takes up to 9 seconds. This will > severely affect the rte-alarm-thread-dependent a task in the system, > like interrupt or hotplug event. So replace with a independent thread > which has t

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events

From: Zhu Tao IXGBE link status task use rte alarm thread in old implementation. Sometime ixgbe link status task takes up to 9 seconds. This will severely affect the rte-alarm-thread-dependent a task in the system, like interrupt or hotplug event. So replace with a independent thread which has t